I was going to write this post a while ago and after my experience specifically for Windows 8, but I chose to wait perhaps a more clear vision. But on the contrary, as the days grow blurry vision and become the answer to the question of what is the future of Windows 8 and more difficult. Windows 8 is not just a regular update of the operating system, this time the system comes with a package of bold decisions imposed on Microsoft's market shifts and the tendency of consumers to the significant hardware tablet touch. The new system comes a beautiful touch interface is commendable contrast to the rest of the interfaces and touch the other moved away from blind imitation of the interface systems iOS from Apple
But what worries me about this new interface is chosen to be the main interface for all devices, whether desktop or tablet interface and providing a sub-traditional option can access them as needed. I think this decision by Microsoft is suicide! As much as I admire this front but my experience them on my laptop proved to me that it does not fit the traditional control method based on the mouse and keyboard. Add to that, as long as the programs that we have become accustomed and has been proven no longer working on this interface and became a run requires access to the traditional interface. Therefore it becomes just a touch interface and an obstacle to users of laptops and desktops to access their favorite programs
As well as decisions that support the direction of the organs of touch Microsoft is support for the first time for the ARM processors and manufacturers are favored by Intel in the manufacture of tablets and mobile phones and to lower their prices and the low consumption of energy. This support means that Microsoft will issue another copy of the system can not in any way based operating system for Intel processors, ARM. Will also be the case with the applications, will require re-applications of the old building to comply with the new processors, which will cause confusion in users
In my opinion, the decision to use one system for computers and devices Touch is not in line with the decision to support processors ARM, is the actual result is two systems for each application! Would not it be better for Microsoft and its users the system to separate the two systems and one for computers and other devices to the touch
I understand the desire of Microsoft's big push to market devices that touch but I hope this is not at the expense of the larger category of users
But what worries me about this new interface is chosen to be the main interface for all devices, whether desktop or tablet interface and providing a sub-traditional option can access them as needed. I think this decision by Microsoft is suicide! As much as I admire this front but my experience them on my laptop proved to me that it does not fit the traditional control method based on the mouse and keyboard. Add to that, as long as the programs that we have become accustomed and has been proven no longer working on this interface and became a run requires access to the traditional interface. Therefore it becomes just a touch interface and an obstacle to users of laptops and desktops to access their favorite programs
As well as decisions that support the direction of the organs of touch Microsoft is support for the first time for the ARM processors and manufacturers are favored by Intel in the manufacture of tablets and mobile phones and to lower their prices and the low consumption of energy. This support means that Microsoft will issue another copy of the system can not in any way based operating system for Intel processors, ARM. Will also be the case with the applications, will require re-applications of the old building to comply with the new processors, which will cause confusion in users
In my opinion, the decision to use one system for computers and devices Touch is not in line with the decision to support processors ARM, is the actual result is two systems for each application! Would not it be better for Microsoft and its users the system to separate the two systems and one for computers and other devices to the touch
I understand the desire of Microsoft's big push to market devices that touch but I hope this is not at the expense of the larger category of users
